Tag Archives: SEC

Investors Lose Claim For Misleading Registration Statements Against Omnicare

By Contributor Joshua Goldsborough, graduate of Florida Coastal School of Law, after working with Well Fargo Financial, and was an intern for the Florida Chief Financial Officer.

The issue is whether Defendants, Omnicare, Incorporated, its officers, and directors, made material misstatements and/or omissions to Plaintiff investors. The investors bought Omnicare securities in connection with a December 2005 public stock offering.

Relief may be sought under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, which provides a remedy for investors who have acquired securities under a registration statement that was materially misleading or omitted material information. Furthermore, it imposes liability on issuers and signers of registration statements containing untrue statements or omissions of material fact.

Here, Plaintiffs allege that Omnicare’s Registration Statement stated that Omnicare’s therapeutic interchanges were meant to provide patients with more efficacious and/or safer drugs than those presently being prescribed and that its contracts with drug companies were “legally and economically valid arrangements that bring value to the healthcare system and patients that we serve.” Plaintiffs argue that these representations were material, untrue and misleading because they effectively concealed Omnicare’s illegal activities from its investors.

Omnicare argues that liability only exists to the extent that the statement was both objectively false and disbelieved by the defendant at the time it was expressed. Furthermore, Omnicare argues that Plaintiff’s failed to state a claim and moved to dismiss the complaint because Plaintiff’s did not adequately plead any allegations that Omnicare knew that the legal compliance statements were false when made.

The court held that the plaintiffs had not adequately pleaded knowledge of wrongdoing.

Comments Off on Investors Lose Claim For Misleading Registration Statements Against Omnicare

Filed under Business

Publicly Traded Companies Can Use Social Media to Disclose Material, Non Public Information

By contributor Brittney Trigg: Florida Coastal School of Law JD and business law certificate candidate 2014, law clerk for Law Offices of Xavier Saunders, P.A.

Publicly traded companies can now use social media as a way to disclose material, non public information, and be in compliance with Regulation FD.  The company must give investors proper notice of the site that the company will use to disclose that information. Regulation FD and Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act prohibit public companies or persons acting on their behalf, from selectively disclosing material non-public information to certain securities professionals, or shareholders where it is reasonably forseeable that they will trade on that information, before it is made available to the general public. Regulation FD protects against insider trading.

A publicly traded company must disclose all material information to the public, and for purposes of complying with Regulation FD, a company makes public disclosure when it distributes information “through a recognized channel of distribution.” Instead of disclosure through the usual press release or a Form 8-K, companies can now use channels such as Facebook, Twitter, or other social media websites. The SEC recently launched an investigation of Netflix, Inc. because the company’s CEO, Reed Hastings posted on his personal Facebook page an announcement that Netflix had streamed 1 billion hours of content in the month of June. Neither Netflix, Inc. nor Hastings had previously used Facebook to disclose information. Nor had they informed shareholders that Facebook would be used to disclose information about Netflix.

The post was not accompanied by a press release or a securities filing (Form 8-K). But Hastings claims that his personal Facebook page is readily available to the public, especially because he has over 200,000 followers, and the post was picked up on several blogs and news posts. After the investigation, the SEC liberalized its policy and said that Facebook and other social media websites were in fact a “recognized channel of distribution.”

Comments Off on Publicly Traded Companies Can Use Social Media to Disclose Material, Non Public Information

Filed under Business, Intellectual Property